WEIRTON CITY COUNCIL
COUNCIL MEETING - SPECIAL
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2007 2:00 P. M.
A regular meeting of the Common Council of the City of Weirton, Hancock and Brooke Counties, West Virginia was held on Tuesday, October 16, 2007 at 2:00 P.M. in Council Chambers of the City of Weirton Municipal Building.
Mayor Harris called the meeting to order.
Councilmembers in Attendance: George Ash Councilmember Ward 4 Ronnie Jones Councilmember Ward 1 Fred Marsh Councilmember Ward 3 Harold Miller Councilmember Ward 2 David Dalrymple Councilmember Ward 6 Max Fijewski Councilmember Ward 7 George Kondik Councilmember Ward 5
City Officials in Attendance: John Brown Public Works Director Gary DuFour City Manager Mark Lowe Weirton Fire Department, Acting Chief Thomas J. Maher, Jr. City Clerk Chief Bruce Marshall Weirton Police Department Rod Rosnick Chief Code Official Valerie Means Finance Director
Others in Attendance: Citizens Giovanni Rossi Media - Weirton Daily Times
Mayor Harris led the Pledge of Allegiance.
COMMUNICATIONS
NONE
CITIZEN COMMENTS
NONE
NEW BUSINESS
Resolution TO ENTER INTO AGREEMENT WITH THE WEST VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS FOR THE ACCPETANCE BY THE DIVISON OF HIGHWAYS OF PENCO ROAD AND SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION BY THE DOH OF CERTAIN MODIFICATIONS ALONG THAT ROADWAY. Motion was made by Councilmember Marsh, second by Councilmember Miller. The motion passed by majority, 7/0.
Resolution TO CONTRIBUTE $25,000.00 FOR INDUSTRIAL SITE PREPARATIONS FOR THE BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT GROUP. Motion was made by Councilmember Miller, second by Councilmember Fijewski.
Councilmember Jones commented, “Do we (unintelligible) that they want $75,000 to clear this land. Right?”
Mayor Harris commented, “$70,000. Is that correct? $70,000.”
Councilmember Jones commented, “Do we have any, did we just get one bid, or do we have…”
Mayor Harris commented, “As far as I know, it was just the one bid. Is that correct?”
Mr. DuFour commented, “Yes. They’re handling all of the estimates (unintelligible).
Mayor Harris commented, “All right.”
Councilmember Jones commented, “My last question to you is why can’t we use somebody in house?”
Mr. DuFour commented, “We might be able to, depending on the lot.”
Councilmember Jones commented, “We laid the line from Campbell Lane clear over to Gross Street. We rented our own dozers. We rented our own truck. We rented everything. And, I mean, I’m sure they’re going to get some money out of that lumber.”
Mayor Harris commented, “Yes. With this being a state property, it’s different than being city property too. So, they probably have certain regulations and laws also for it being a piece of state property. That’s something that we have to ask them.”
Councilmember Kondik commented, “If the West Virginia Development Corp. owns this, why are they asking the counties to pay for what they should be doing?”
Mr. DuFour commented, “And, again, you were not present at the last regular meeting, and we had representatives of the BDC and the West Virginia Development Office. And, their feeling is that the administration in Charleston wants to see local communities and local governments contribute to these projects, and this was seen as some to actually contribute to this site development.”
Councilmember Kondik commented, “And, a developer that would go up there, Gary, you’ve been around this a lot longer than I have. A developer that would go up there and just look at the land, somebody had said this earlier, just to look at this land, to eyeball it and figure out what they’re going to do with it.”
Mr. DuFour commented, “Agreed. I think this is a means to help that developer with costs, to get into a situation and say we’re bringing the lot to you cleared. That’s what they’re presenting to us.”
Mayor Harris commented, “I think that’s, you know, I don’t think that’s what they said to us, but I think that’s what they wanted to say. You know. I think that they want us to clear it off to save them money. That’s what I believe. But…”
Councilmember Jones commented, “I believe that too.”
Councilmember Ash commented, “Mayor, I have a problem spending $25,000 of our money with no guarantees that a business is really coming in. I wouldn’t take $25,000 of my money and gamble on something down at the race track, so I’m not going to do it with the resident’s money. So, if we had something in here, and I talked to someone, I think it was the week before, where there’s something in here that says the $25,000 could be put in if the business shows up. If we have a guarantee that the business is going to sign a contract, then I wouldn’t have such a problem with it. But, I just can’t see spending $25,000 that we may or may not have on a gamble.”
Mayor Harris commented, “Right. Well, one thing we did ask them at the last council meeting was a commitment, and at that time the state couldn’t give us a commitment and also the business that was interested in coming in could not give us a commitment either.”
Councilmember Ash commented, “And, they still can’t, right.”
Mayor Harris commented, “They still can’t.”
Councilmember Fijewski commented, “Where is the Business Development Corporation?”
Mr. DuFour commented, “One of them, that is, Mr. Six is in Huntington and the other gentlemen, Mr. Mosby is out of the country on state business.”
Councilmember Fijewski commented, “Mr. Mayor, I agree with some of the comments that are being made. But, it seems like there’s been another ingredient added into the mix, specifically, at least I had heard from some sources that this company that was actively looking at this site has already made a commitment to another site. Now, that is nothing but third party hearsay for legal terms, but that’s a pretty overwhelming point, I think if it’s accurate. I don’t know. I haven’t necessarily bought into the fact that we’re going to have to clear this land on way or the other. I don’t know if I’d still, from one hand I did and one hand I don’t. The more overriding color has been the information that at least some of us have heard that this company has in fact already made a commitment to another location. And, if that’s accurate, then we’re doing this in bad faith, and I would hope that we could find out if that’s accurate or not. I’m one, and I’ll be the first to admit it, I’m one that wants to get a company in here. I want to get going. I don’t want to drag feet, and I think city council should be and expediter of these things to make it all work. But, we need to make it work for the right reasons, and having that kind of information really makes it difficult for me.”
Mayor Harris commented, “I really, myself, I really hate to use the taxpayers money also without a commitment, because if they don’t come in, then we lost $25,000. But, if they do come in…”
Councilmember Fijewski commented, “Is there a way for us to address this issue in the form of a motion that makes it contingent on verifying the intent of this company? Is that doable?”
Mayor Harris commented, “To make a motion for the $25,000 with a, with the commitment of the business coming in?”
Councilmember Miller commented, “I understand also that the contribution from the two counties are contingent on what we do.”
Mayor Harris commented, “From what county?”
Councilmember Miller commented, “Brooke County?”
CROSSTALK
Councilmember Miller commented, “And, there is money set aside from RUE21. I know it’s over fifty. I don’t know exactly what it is.”
Ms. Means commented, “There would be enough for that and I guess depending upon what Council does here today, I would need a clarification even if it’s a contingent approval of where the funds would be taken from.”
Councilmember Miller commented, “And, I do agree also with some of the comments, because this company was coming here and they changed their mind. They were going to Ohio. Then they were staying in Pennsylvania. So, I think we need to tag something to it. I don’t think anyone is against development or encouraging and this may be the only carrot that we can put out there, because we can’t hand them a long term tax abatements and things because we don’t have any ability to do that right now.”
Councilmember Dalrymple commented, “I just, my problem, and I agree with just about everything that’s been said up here is that $25,000 is a lot of money when we’re tight. I really don’t think that we need to be spending that type of money without any official commitment from them. Verbal is not good enough. It’s like Councilman Kondik said about the site, you know any site developer that’s worth his salt is going to be able to look at it and see what can be put there. He can look at a side of a mountain and picture what’s going to be on the side of that mountain. That’s their job to do that. That it was said by the gentlemen that were here last week that they can’t get an idea what it looks like, I find that laughable. Also, I have issues with it because of the track record. Can anybody tell me, beside the RUE21 project, what has been brought in here successfully by this group? I can’t think of any. I could understand it maybe if they had one or two other businesses they brought in here and they had a track record built up. And, they said well look guys, you know, we have these guy on a hook, and you know if we get this twenty-five and well be able to get moving with it. But, there is no track record. The only track record we have is failure, so far, and I have a real hard time of committing $25,000 without a written commitment to a organization that has not done a good job to bring development to this community whatsoever.”
Councilmember Fijewski commented, “Two things that trouble me, the document that we received as part of the meeting, the third bullet from the bottom states that the current prospect has already conducted interviews for local employees, and has started hiring and training for the new location. And, if I recall correctly the last, at the last meeting, the presentation was made. The individual indicated that it was his belief that they would start breaking ground on construction some time during the spring. Well, two of those, this fact and that fact, to me makes it sound as if, OK, they’re actively going to make a decision, a positive decision on our park. But, then based on what I’ve heard this week about them already committed to another site throws all of this into real question. So, I’m hung up on it. I don’t think that we, if we do proceed, we should proceed with some sort of stipulation indicating contingency upon whatever the group here feels appropriate. But, just and out and out approval, and I never thought I’d hear myself saying this, I just, I just feel it’s not a good decision.”
Mayor Harris commented, “Well, at any time we could do a motion to amend the agenda to give them the $25,000.”
Councilmember Ash commented, “Mayor I’d like to make a motion to amend it now and put that contingency in there. I think that Mr. DuFour’s writing over there. He’s written something up, I’m sure.”
Councilmember Kondik commented, “Why do we have to put something in there that if somebody comes that we’re going to clean it out for them? Why don’t we just vote on what they’re asking for us now? And, if they come back and ask us again, then we’ll make a decision. I don’t want to, personally…”
CROSSTALK
Mayor Harris commented, “Because, what was said was they needed an answer quickly before they can make their move to another piece of property.”
CROSSTALK
Councilmember Kondik commented, “From what I’m hearing here…”
Mayor Harris commented, “But, we don’t know there was a commitment.”
CROSSTALK
Councilmember Kondik commented, “You’re making a commitment.”
Councilmember Ash commented, “To me I believe we all agree that we want development. We all agree that we want businesses in town. We definitely all want that. But, I don’t think any of us are going to agree to spending $25,000 or any other amount of money without something amended to this decision. If the business signs a contract that they’re willing to come in, we may be willing to give them the $25,000.”
Councilmember Fijewski commented, “I would go…this is discussion. Right? We’re in the discussion? One of the things we’ve got to be careful of is that we don’t drag our feet so much that economic development becomes difficult. What would be your thoughts in regards to amending it to say that if we get a commitment that we would approve the $25,000? This way, we’re not holding up anything. We’re making a firm commitment that we’re going to do this if we get a commitment. And, what would be your thoughts on that?”
Councilmember Ash commented, “I could probably live with that…”
Councilmember Kondik commented, “You could always have forty-eight hours to commit $25,000 for anything.”
Councilmember Fijewski commented, “Yes, but…”
Councilmember Kondik commented, “If you commit it, if you commit it now, then you’re committed if anybody comes to do it. If anybody else comes and says hey listen I’m going to buy land in Three Springs Drive. I want you to do what you’re going to do for these people. I really don’t think that we should be making any kind of commitments, unless we’re going to make a commitment to the fact that we’re going to do it or we’re not going to do it.”
Councilmember Marsh commented, “Well, if I may, and I’ve wrestled with this, fought with it, and this is in my ward. And, we have been dealt a plate that we cannot win either way. My very principles tell me this should not be had. OK. If somebody wants to buy a piece of property, it’s their responsibility to clear it.”
Councilmember Kondik commented, “Correct.”
Councilmember Marsh commented, “If we’re going to subsidize something, what about all the other businesses that have brought us to the dance up to this point? We’re not doing anything for them. On the other side of the coin, what if there is a glimmer of light that these two guys are talking about? I’d like to read something. It was thing from the Charleston Daily Mail. This is going to be a far deeper problem. This is where I have the problem with the $25,000, with giving any money. ‘The truth is the state could and should be helping West Virginia manufacturers face intense competition, but, not with grants for loans to have fake schemes for politically favored recipients.’ On down further, they hit the nail right on the head. ‘West Virginia still does not have its policy house in order.’ That’s what’s really bugging me about this whole thing is if we can take the taxpayers money and pay for this thing, but yet the state still controls the strings.”
Councilmember Fijewski commented, “Which is a huge issue, I agree with you, bigger than what we’re going to solve here today.”
Councilmember Marsh commented, “Right.”
Councilmember Ash commented, “But, my other question is, Mayor, why does the City of Weirton have to give $25,000 when the county gives $25,000? I think Brooke County’s giving $20,000. We’re giving the same amount of money as them. We don’t have the same budget they have. We don’t have the same income they have.”
Mayor Harris commented, “Well, I made the…”
Councilmember Kondik commented, “But, the West Virginia Development Office is giving nothing.”
Mayor Harris commented, “Right. I made the same argument before. The city is not a county. The city is part Hancock County and Brooke County. Hancock County and Brooke County should be paying this amount of money if anyone should. We’re not, the way they talked was we’re our separate entity, and we’re not. We’re part of Hancock and Brooke County, and I do believe that Hancock County ought to give X amount and Brooke County ought to give X amount, instead of bringing the City of Weirton in as a separate entity. But, you know, at this time it’s your guys’ decision.”
Councilmember Dalrymple commented, “Brooke County’s going to be the people that reap the benefits and the property taxes too. I mean, if there’s something constructed, whatever that might be, they are going to reap the benefits of that.”
Councilmember Marsh commented, “I would feel a lot better if this resolution had in it that once there was an option on the land for $10,000, that the purchaser of the land buys an option to it. I would be much more comfortable in putting that out.”
Mayor Harris commented, “You want to go ahead and say something?”
Mr. DuFour commented, “Because Councilman Ash must have seen me writing, so I’m going start reading to you Councilman Ash what I scribbled down. The action section of the resolution authorizing the contribution of $25,000; ‘Such contribution shall be conditioned on receipt of a written firm commitment from the developer.’”
Mayor Harris commented, “So, at this time we can go ahead and vote this through or vote against it, or we can amend it. You know it’s up to one of you.”
Councilmember Ash commented, “I’d like to say one more thing based on what’s been said here. When you made that, I wasn’t going to agree with you and your comment there for a few seconds. And, then I started listening to George and what he was saying, that if we do this the taxpayers of Weirton that live in Brooke and Hancock County are going to pay double.”
Councilmember Kondik commented, “Right.”
Councilmember Ash commented, “And, so, I don’t care if there’s an amendment or not. I’m not going to support it.”
Councilmember Fijewski commented, “How do you see that?”
Councilmember Ash commented, “Because, they’ve already paid their taxes through the counties. They’re already paying their taxes, that tax dollars are going towards this project.”
Councilmember Fijewski commented, “OK. Let’s not kid ourselves. Let’s face reality. Economic Development is a very, very competitive environment. Every county, every state, every municipality tries to attract business. It’s so competitive. We’re all well aware of it. But, just to point out they give up taxes for multiple years. They make contributions. They’re giving free land. They even build the building for them in many localities. So, all we have to do is go up the road here for seven miles or eight miles and you see this great big sign up there, you know, where they’re going to build on spec for these corporations and do all of this. So, I’m with Mr. Marsh on this. I understand that this sticks in our craws so to speak, but the fact of the matter is that this is common ordinary practice, and everybody is doing it. And, to suggest that somehow we can’t or shouldn’t because of $25,000, they can run up the road. They’ll go to the Wal-Mart complex over in Ohio, and they’ll be happy to do it. Is that right? No. But, let’s not put our blinders on. This is the world in which we live. So, I just suggest we need to keep that in mind. We talked about economic development until we’re blue in the face. Sometimes you’ve got to bite the bullet and take a chance. I wouldn’t include this with the track though, George.”
LAUGHTER
Councilmember Ash commented, “Well, I remember when I was on council for those past twelve years, and George you remember some of these. We took chances like this, and it didn’t work.”
Councilmember Fijewski commented, “I understand.”
Councilmember Kondik commented, “I remember when the last administration took a big chance with the AMPS, and it didn’t work.”
Councilmember Dalrymple commented, “And, we had conditions.”
Councilmember Kondik commented, “And, it didn’t work.”
Councilmember Dalrymple commented, “We had conditions on all of that, and it still didn’t work.”
Councilmember Kondik commented, “And, it still didn’t work.”
Councilmember Dalrymple commented, “Just because of the past things that failed, that doesn’t mean that we’re going to fail continually for the rest of our life I guess you could say. But, it all comes back to the BDC not bringing anything to the table since I can remember. And, here they are coming in on the last minute, on the floor, holding our feet to the fire, saying we need this $25,000 and we need it now.”
Councilmember Kondik commented, “And Councilman Fijewski, we did give Roll Coaters, eight years ago, we gave them $75,000, and it was a benefit to the whole city. It did work. You know, people like that want to come to us, we’re business friendly. We are. We gave them $75,000.”
Councilmember Miller commented, “Well, I think prior to the previous administration, Weirton Steel still had a very strong influence in this community. If you remember, West Virginia Development and Weirton Steel were the ones that turned Waldorf away. Waldorf Distributing and they’re now down in Beech Bottom in a very beautiful facility down there. They didn’t want that to get their type of building in their complex. So, they controlled and turned down a lot of opportunities when they were still alive and fighting. And, I think that’s changed quite a bit. I was just going to say, I know this company they’re talking about. I dealt with them about seven years ago. They’re a strong company. They’ve grown out of an old facility in Pittsburgh and there’s a handful of people that live in Weirton that work there now, presently. And, Freddy was asking me a little bit about the company this morning, and it is a good solid company. It’s been in business a long time. It’s just that I don’t have a lot of confidence in the West Virginia Development Office or to the local BDC.”
Councilmember Fijewski commented, “Councilman, have you heard any of the rumors about them already having made a commitment to Pittsburgh.”
Councilmember Miller commented, “No. I didn’t hear anything.”
Mayor Harris commented, “We heard that, well we didn’t hear actually, Mr. Mosby is the one that stated that to us, that they committed to a spot that was in Ohio. Correct?”
Councilmember Fijewski commented, “Is that what it was?”
Mayor Harris commented, “And, I think they committed to a spot in Ohio. They were looking at us. They were looking at Ohio. They committed to a spot in Ohio, and then they changed their mind, for some reason, and they came back to us. So, this is the second time they came back.”
Councilmember Fijewski commented, “I heard him say that Mayor, but I heard after that that they had made a commitment to a site in Pennsylvania.”
Councilmember Miller commented, “If that’s serious, then we ought to follow up on that. It’s wasting our time if they’ve committed.”
Councilmember Fijewski commented, “And, again, I don’t want to mislead anybody. That’s a third party, and it’s nothing but rumor, and I have now way to substantiate that.”
Mayor Harris commented, “Is there any more discussion on this or do we want to amend it or…”
Councilmember Miller commented, “Amend to it?”
Mayor Harris commented, “I’m asking if there is any.”
Councilmember Miller commented, “Oh. I thought Max had done that early on.”
Councilmember Fijewski commented, “I thought George was going to…”
Councilmember Miller commented, “He’s probably amending it to…”
Councilmember Marsh commented, “George is going to…”
Councilmember Ash commented, “No. I’m not going to support the amendment. There’s no sense asking for it.”
Mayor Harris commented, “Does anybody want to make the amendment?”
Councilmember Fijewski commented, “I’ll make the motion on the amendment.”
Mayor Harris commented, “On what Mr.….”
Councilmember Fijewski commented, “On what Gary has indicated.”
Mayor Harris commented, “Mr. DuFour would you say that again?”
Mr. Maher commented, “Would you please read it?”
Mr. DuFour commented, “Again, this is added to the last paragraph, ‘such contribution shall be conditioned on receipt of a written firm commitment from the developer.’”
Mayor Harris commented, “At this time I’m going to ask for a second on the amendment.”
Councilmember Miller commented, “I’ll second it.”
Mayor Harris commented, “Any more comments or questions?”
ROLL CALL VOTE:
Councilmember Kondik No Councilmember Fijewski Yes Councilmember Dalrymple No Councilmember Miller Yes Councilmember Marsh Yes Councilmember Jones No Councilmember Ash No
The motion for an amendment was defeated by 4/3.
Next, a roll call vote was conducted on the original motion. ROLL CALL VOTE:
Councilmember Ash No Councilmember Jones No Councilmember Marsh No Councilmember Miller No Councilmember Dalrymple No Councilmember Fijewski No Councilmember Kondik No
The motion failed by majority, 7/0.
Resolution AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF WEIRTON TO WORK PRISONERS AS DIRECTED BY ARTICLE V SECTION 1 OF THE WEIRTON CITY CHARTER. Motion was made by Councilmember Ash, second by Councilmember Marsh.
Councilmember Fijewski commented, “I have a question. Approximately four or five weeks ago on Pennsylvania Avenue, there was a police officer, not a city police officer, and several individuals in orange jump suits walking up and down, walking up Pennsylvania Avenue cleaning the highway. Was that county folks?”
Mayor Harris commented, “Yes. They were supposed to bring their…”
Councilmember Fijewski commented, “So, this resolution is obviously different than that because that was county folks doing that. Are county folks, do they come into Weirton and clean county roads with prisoners?”
Mayor Harris commented, “The County and the state, but they do do that.”
Councilmember Fijewski commented, “OK.”
Mayor Harris commented, “But, what’s being asked here is, this is some, do you want to go with this, this is pretty much…”
Councilmember Ash commented, “The last two Thursdays I’ve been coming to municipal court and the prosecutor, Vince Gurrera and the judge, Steve Dragisich have offered community service to the persons that are being fined. In order for them to do that and not, and be protected and so they are protected by the city, we have to pass a resolution stating that this council agrees with it. If we…and that’s under the Charter.”
Councilmember Fijewski commented, “I understand that.”
Councilmember Ash commented, “And, if we don’t do that then they cannot offer the community service to anybody.”
Mayor Harris commented, “At this time…”
Councilmember Fijewski commented, “I’m all for it. Question. What liability do we have if someone gets hurt?”
Mayor Harris commented, “We are, there is a liability issue. But, what we have to do is the same thing we had the Workforce West Virginia with the summer youth kids. We had a liability issue there also. The way we looked at it was I wanted to give these individuals a chance to work off their fines, because it’s, some of the individuals, it’s been years since they’ve paid any fines. And, we just let it go. Nothing was done about it. So, now we’re giving them a chance to work off their fines, and we’re getting something in the community. Now, the Workforce West Virginia, this is a liability, one of the kids, I think hit a car with a weed whacker, threw a rock up, cost 130 some dollars. Now, you’ve got to look at it this way. This is what I think I said to Mr. Brown. We had three or four kids working 30 to 40 hours a week and we got six weeks out of them. Times that about free labor versus 130 bucks, that’s well worth it. So, I believe that, you know, this is a liability issue, but sometimes we have to take risks. I think what we’re going to get out these gentlemen or women is free work versus not getting paid for our fines at all.”
Councilmember Miller commented, “I have a couple questions. I get the program, but like Councilman Fijewski, I have a concern with liability and also supervision, and workman’s comp. insurance and all of those things. Are we actually paying these individuals or are we giving credit towards what they owe?”
Mayor Harris commented, “We’re giving them credit towards what they owe.”
Councilmember Miller commented, “So, we’re not issuing checks to them?
Mayor Harris commented, “No.”
Councilmember Miller commented, “Actually issuing credit. OK. And how’s the supervision? Is it done through John’s department?”
Mayor Harris commented, “Right. We would have one individual from John’s department, and also we talked to, with Mr. Ash, and individual that’s running a facility that would send down two supervisors at any given time that they decide to use their people, which was…what was the different…”
Councilmember Kondik commented, “Are these like hard core criminals, or just misdemeanors?”
Mayor Harris commented, “Well the ones that we would do with city court are city fines. The ones that were down there would be misdemeanors. Is that what it is?”
CROSSTALK
Councilmember Kondik commented, “Directly.”
Councilmember Fijewski commented, “I was more concerned, not about damaging a vehicle. I was more concerned of a liability issue for one of them for example was walking along the highway and got hit by a vehicle. Not perhaps, they would sue the person that hit them, of course, but could it come back on us contending that we didn’t provide a safe environment, etc.”
Mayor Harris commented, “Our city attorney’s not here, but, I mean, I can honestly say that I mean, if they’re going to work, if they’re doing something with us in the city, they’re going to sue. I mean, if they get hurt, they’re going to sue us. It’s a liability issue, yes. Is it worth it? That’s the question.”
Councilmember Fijewski commented, “Gotcha.”
ROLL CALL VOTE:
Councilmember Dalrymple: Yes Councilmember Fijewski Yes Councilmember Kondik Yes Councilmember Ash Yes Councilmember Jones Yes Councilmember Marsh Yes Councilmember Miller Yes
The motion passed by majority, 7/0.
Motion to adjourn after the closing prayer was made by Councilmember Kondik, second by Councilmember Ash. Motion was carried by majority, 7/0.
ADJOURNMENT
With no further business before this October 16, 2007 special session of the Weirton City Council the meeting was adjourned after the closing prayer.
|